Defining and Valuing the Relationship Pattern of Actors' Involvement on Cattle Farming Systems using Stakeholder Network Analysis in West New Guinea, Indonesia
Pendefinisian dan Penilaian Pola Hubungan Keterlibatan Aktor Pada Sistim Peternkan Sapi dengan Menggunakan Analisis Stakeholder Network di Papua Barat, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46549/jipvet.v11i3.112Keywords:
Actors, cattle farming business, intervention and innovation, shared resources, stakeholder network analysisAbstract
Abstrak
Sapi merupakan salah satu peternakan prioritas utama di Indonesia. Ternak sapi telah memainkan peran penting dalam aspek ekonomi dari total pendapatan. Sebagai peternakan prioritas karena berbagai keterlibatan dan peran pemangku kepentingan. Studi dilakukan di Manokwari pada bulan April-Juni 2019 dengan menggunakan focus group discussion terhadap dua puluh individu, kelompok dan lembaga massa yang diwakili. Pertanyaan yang dibahas mengenai latar belakang, pengiriman sumber daya, interkonektivitas antar aktor, intervensi dan inovasi. Temuan utama adalah bahwa aktor yang dikelompokkan mendominasi, diikuti oleh aktor hukum, lembaga swasta, peran pemangku kepentingan dan memiliki efek positif karena kepentingan. Namun, ancaman eksis baik secara langsung tetapi tanpa efek balik. Tiga sumber daya bersama teratas adalah akses, kepuasan, dan waktu yang dihabiskan. Aktor dapat memiliki program jangka panjang dengan keberlanjutan menggunakan sumber daya netral hingga kuat. Hubungan aktor ditemukan dalam tiga kelompok, yaitu positif, negatif dan tidak ada hubungan. Intervensi sangat dibutuhkan, yaitu waktu yang dihabiskan, kepuasan, kebijakan, pengetahuan dan akses. Prioritas inovasi akan keterampilan, kebijakan, dan pengetahuan.
Kata kunci: Analisis jaringan pemangku kepentingan; Intervensi dan inovasi; Pelaku; Sumber daya bersama; Usaha peternakan sapi. .
Abstract
Cattle is one of the top priority animal agriculture in Indonesia. It has played significant roles in economical aspect of Total revenues. Those are due to stakeholders’ involvement. Study was done in Manokwari from April to June 2019 by using focus group discussion towards twenty various represented individuals, groups and mass institutions. The queries discussed concerning background, resources delivery, interconnectivity amongst actors, intervention and innovation. The primarily finding is that grouped actors dominated, followed by laws actors, private types institutions, stakeholder role and having positive effect due to importance. However, threat existed directly without turn-back effect. The three top shared resources were access, satisfaction, and time spent. Actors can have long term period program with sustainability using neutral to strong power resource. Relationship of actors found in three groups, i.e. positive, negative and no relationship. Intervention was urgently needed, i.e. time spent, satisfaction, policy, knowledge and access. Priority of innovation will be skills, policy, and knowledge.
Keywords: Actors; Cattle farming business; Intervention and innovation; Shared resources; Stakeholder network analysis.
Downloads
References
Ariansyah, J, Ismail A, and Abdullah L. 2013. “Analysis on The Roles of Stakeholders in The Management of Integrated Breeding Beef Cattle Farm Program at PT KPC East Kutai.†Media Peternakan, no. August: 152–58. https://doi.org/10.5398/medpet.2013.36.2.152.
Bastian, M, Heymann S, and Jacomy M. 2009. “Gephi : An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks Visualization and Exploration of Large Graphs.†International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 361–62. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1341.1520.
Bryson, JM. 2007. “What to Do When Stakeholders Matter Analysis Techniques.†Public Management Review 9037 (2004): 20–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030410001675722.
Cardoso, AS, Berndt A, Leytem A, Alves BJR, De Carvalho NO, Henrique L, Soares De B, Urquiaga S, and Boddey RM. 2016. “Impact of the Intensi Fi Cation of Beef Production in Brazil on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Land Use.†AGSY 143: 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.12.007.
Flintan, F, Truebswasser U. 2019. Extensive Pastoralist ( Cattle ): Leveraging for Food and Nutrition Security. Encyclopedia of Food Security and Sustainability. Vol. 3. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.21546-1.
Freeman, RE. 2015. “The Stakeholder Approach.†Strategic Management, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139192675.003.
Gerssen-gondelach, SJ, Lauwerijssen RBG, HavlÃk P, Herrero M, Valin H, Faaij APC, and Wicke B. 2017. “Agriculture , Ecosystems and Environment Intensi Fi Cation Pathways for Beef and Dairy Cattle Production Systems : Impacts on GHG Emissions , Land Occupation and Land Use Change.†“Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment†240: 135–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.02.012.
Gollnow, F, and Lakes T. 2014. “Policy Change , Land Use , and Agriculture : The Case of Soy Production and Cattle Ranching in Brazil , 2001 e 2012.†Applied Geography 55: 203–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.09.003.
Gorsich, EE, Luis AD, Buhnerkempe MG, Grear DA, Portacci K, Miller RS, and Webb, CT. 2016. “Mapping U . S . Cattle Shipment Networks : Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Trade Communities from 2009 to 2011†134: 82–91.
Grimble, Robin, and Kate Wellard. 1997. “Stakeholder Methodologies in Natural Resource Management : A Review of Principles , Contexts , Experiences and Opportunities†55 (2).
Hajjar, R, Newton P, Adshead D, Bogaerts M, Maguire-rajpaul, VA, Pinto LFG, Mcdermott CL , Milder JC, Wollenberg E, and Agrawal A. 2019. “Scaling up Sustainability in Commodity Agriculture : Transferability of Governance Mechanisms across the Coffee and Cattle Sectors in Brazil.†Journal of Cleaner Production 206: 124–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.102.
Hasan, H, Sirajuddin SN, Darma R, and Sudirman I. 2015. “Value Added Analysis of Beef Cattle Supply Chain Actors Micro-Scale Community Farm Based,†no. September.
Iyai, DA, and Yaku A. 2015. “Identifikasi Sistim Peternakan Di Manokwari, Papua Barat-Indonesia The Identification of Livestock Farming Systems in Manokwari, West Papua-Indonesia.†Jurnal Peternakan Indonesia 17 (2): 94–104.
Iyai, DA, Saragih DTR, and Rumbiak FP. 2016. “Effect of Traditional Cattle Farming Systems on Farmer Knowledge , Cattle Performances and Agribusiness Potential in West New Guinea-Papua Barat Province , Indonesia†4 (1): 5–10. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20160401.12.
Komalawati, RWA, Nurmalina R, and Hakim DB. 2019. “Modeling Price Volatility and Supply Response of Beef in Indonesia.†Tropical Animal Science Journal 42 (2): 159–66.
Krupa, M, Cenek M, Powell J, and Trammell EJ. 2017. “Mapping the Stakeholders : Using Social Network Analysis to Increase the Legitimacy and Transparency of Participatory Scenario Planning.†Society and Natural Resources; An International Journal 1920 (December). https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2017.1376140.
Laurance, WF, Sayer J, and Cassman KG. 2014. “Agricultural Expansion and Its Impacts on Tropical Nature.†Trends in Ecology & Evolution 29 (2): 107–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.12.001.
Mappigau, P, Asnawi A, and Kadir S. 2015. “Collaboration Problems among Cattle Farmers and Traders in Bali Cattle Supply Chain : How to Improve Cattle Farmers Income†23 (2): 231–38. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2015.23.02.22074.
Mariantonietta, F, Alessia S, Giustina P, and Alessia S. 2017. “Accepted Manuscript.†https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.167.
Mayulu, H, and Sutrisno CI. 2014. “Kebijakan Pengembangan Peternakan Sapi Potong Di Indonesia†29 (0541).
Moleong, LJ. 1991. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. 3rd ed. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya Offset, Bandung.
Muniesa, F. 2015. Actor-Network Theory. International Encyclopedia of Social & Behavioral Sciences. Second Edi. Vol. 1. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.85001-1.
Oliveira, R De, Gustavo L, Hall JAJ, Carlos A, Fonseca R, Alexander P, Crespolini M, and Moran D. 2017. “Sustainable Intensi Fi Cation of Brazilian Livestock Production through Optimized Pasture Restoration.†Agricultural Systems 153: 201–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.02.001.
Priyanti, A, Mahendri IG, and Cramb R. 2014. “Characteristics of End Users in the Beef Supply Chain in East Java , Indonesia Characteristics of End Users in the Beef Supply Chain in East Java , Indonesia,†no. November.
Rachman, NM, Cahyadi ER, and Hardjomidjojo H. 2017. “Biaya Transaksi Dan Nilai Tambah Pada Rantai Pasok Daging Sapi Di Kota Bogor†14 (1): 22–31. https://doi.org/10.17358/JMA.14.1.22.
Rahardjo, M. 2013. “Beef Cattle Integration on Dry-Land Farming in Sragen Central-Java Indonesia : Improvements of Economic and Environmental Carrying Capacity Aspects†15 (May): 135–43.
Resti, Y, Baars R, Verschuur M, and Duteurtre G. 2017. “The Role of Cooperative in The Milk Value Chain in West Bandung Regency , West Java Province.†Media Peternakan 40 (December): 210–17.
Ringle, CM, Sven WS, Becker JM. 2005. “SmartPLS.†Germany: SmartPLS GmbH. www.smartpls.com/smartpls2.
Satmoko, S, and Lestari CMS. 2018. “The Influence of Internal and External Members Factors on The Sustainability of Cattle Farming in Jepara Regency , Central Java†20 (32): 71–80.
Schiffer, E. 2007. “Net-Map.†http://www.visualcomplexity.com/vc/project.cfm?id=644.
Serey, M, Mom S, Kouch T, and Bunna C. 2014. “Cattle Production Systems in NW Cambodia†26 (February): 86320.
Setianto, NA, Cameron DC, and Gaughan JB. 2014. “Structuring the Problematic Situation of Smallholder Beef Farming in Central Java , Indonesia : Using Systems Thinking as an Entry Point to Taming Complexity†3 (3): 164–74. https://doi.org/10.5836/ijam/2014-03-05.
Setianto, NA, Cameron D, and Gaughan JB. 2014. “Identifying Archetypes of an Enhanced System Dynamics Causal Loop Diagram in Pursuit of Strategies to Improve Smallholder Beef Farming in Java , Indonesia†654 (August 2013): 642–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2312.
Shabrina, N, Syarief R, and Arkeman Y. 2015. “Strategi Peningkatan Rantai Nilai Agroindustri Daging Sapi†682.
Stephenson, K and Zalen M. 1989. “Rethinking Centrality: Methods and Examples.†Social Networks 11 (1): 1–37.
Tavirimirwa, B, Mwembe R, Ngulube B, Banana NYD, Nyamushamba GB, Ncube S, and Nkomboni D. 2013. “Communal Cattle Production in Zimbabwe : A Review†25 (November): 2013.
Tawaf, R, and Lengkey HAW. 2007. “The Impact of Imported Beef Booxed to Feedlot Business Development in Indonesia.†Seria Zootehnie 53: 401–9.
Vasco, C, Sánchez C, Limaico K, and Hugo V. 2018. “Motivations to Consume Agroecological Food : An Analysis of Farmers ’ Markets in Quito , Ecuador†119 (2): 1–10.
Ventura, BA, Weary DM, Giovanetti AS, and Von Keyserlingk MAG. 2016. “Author ’ s Accepted Manuscript.†Livestock Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.10.004.
Wahyudi, J. 2017. “The Determinant Factors of Biogas Technology Adoption in Cattle Farming : Evidences from Pati , Indonesia†6 (October): 4940.
Widi, TSM, Udo HMJ, Suparta IG, and Baliarti E. 2004. “Livestock Sharing Arrangements : An Alternative Opportunity for Farmers to Rear Cattle ( a Case Study in the Province of Yogyakarta Special Region ). Livestock Sharing Arrangements in the Province of Yogyakarta Special Region-Indonesia , Perspectives From,†no. January.
Yustika, AE, Purnomo M, Kaluge D, Risanto Y, Subandi H, Wibisono R, Ramadhani M, and Aini DN. 2014. “Participation , Investment Institutions , and Local Economic Development : The Study of Food Security in East Java - Indonesia.†International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 4 (5): 186–93.
Zanten, HHE Van, Meerburg BG, Bikker P, Herrero M, and De Boer IJM. 2016. “Opinion Paper : The Role of Livestock in a Sustainable Diet : A Land-Use Perspective,†547–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115002694.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Deny Anjelus Iyai, Mulyadi Mulyadi, Muhammad Jen Wajo, Rosdiana Naibey, Dwi Nur Hayati, Noviyanti Noviyanti, Makarius Bajari, Johan Koibur, Yafed Syufi, Stepanus Pakage, Noveling Inriani, Lamberthus E. Nuhuyanan, Jublyana Purba, Bernadetha W.I. Rahayu, Hendrik Fatem, Isti Widayati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Jurnal Ilmu Peternakan dan Veteriner Tropis (Journal of Tropical Animal and Veterinary Science) Posting Your Article Policy at https://journal.fapetunipa.ac.id/index.php/JIPVET/publicationethics
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities “tacitly or explicitly“ of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Jurnal Ilmu Peternakan dan Veteriner Tropis (Journal of Tropical Animal and Veterinary Science) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
