Explorasi dan Studi Komposisi Botani Gulma di Perkebunan Karet PTPN IX Kebun Getas sebagai Pakan Ternak Ruminansia

Exploration and Study of The Botanical Weeds Composition in Rubber Plantation PTPN IX Getas Farm as Ruminants Feed

Authors

  • Harwanto Harwanto Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto
  • Bambang Suwignyo Fakultas Peternakan, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, 55281
  • Zaenal Bachruddin Fakultas Peternakan, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, 55281
  • Galih Pawening Fakultas Peternakan, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, 55281

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46549/jipvet.v11i1.133

Keywords:

Environmental conditions, Immature plants, Rubber plantation, Weed

Abstract

Abstract 

Weed is one of the plants that grow around rubber plantations that have the potential to provide forage for ruminant feed. This study aimed to explore the environmental conditions and identify the botanical composition of weeds under the shade of rubber trees in immature plants (IP) at PTPN IX, Getas Farm, Semarang, Central Java. Exploratory research was conducted to identify the botanical composition of weeds in three IP groups, such as 1-2, 3-4, and 5-6 years old. The composition of the weeds’ botany was divided based on the plants’ morphology into grass, legume, forbs, and browse. The environmental conditions data were analyzed using the ANOVA method and followed by Duncan's Multiple Range Test (DMRT). The botanical composition data were tabulated using a summed dominance ratio (SDR). The results showed the light intensity, wind speed, environment temperature, and weed botanical composition decreased as the rubber plants ages. The composition of rubber plantation weeds on IP 1-2 years old consisted of 32 species (5 kinds of grass, 4 legumes, 21 forbs, and 2 browse). The composition of weeds on IP 3-4 years old consisted of 15 species (8 kinds of grass, 2 legumes, and 5 forbs), while IP 5-6 years old consisted of 6 species (4 kinds of grass, 1 legume, and 1 forb). The dominant weeds of each IP were Calopogonium mucunoides, Cyrtococcum acrescens, and Cyrtococcum oxyphyllum, respectively. Based on the results of the study it was concluded that the area of IP 1-2 years old rubber plantation weeds has the highest botanical composition and potential as ruminant feed. 

Keywords: Environmental conditions; Immature plants; Rubber plantation; Weed

 

Abstrak 

Gulma merupakan salah satu tanaman yang tumbuh di sekitar tanaman perkebunan karet yang berpotensi sebagai penyedia hijauan pakan ternak ruminansia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi kondisi lingkunganpertumbuhan gulma dan mengidentifikasi komposisi botani di bawah naungan pohon karet pada tanaman belum menghasilkan (TBM), di PTPN IX, Kebun Getas. Semarang, Jawa Tengah. Penelitian dilakukan secara eksploratif terhadap kondisi lingkungan dan identifikasi komposisi botani gulma pada 3 kelompok TBM yaitu umur 1-2; 3-4; dan 5-6 tahun. Komposisi botani gulma dibagi berdasarkan morfologi tanaman yaitu rumput, legum, forb, dan browse. Data kondisi lingkungan kelompok TBM dianalisis menggunakan ANOVA dan diuji lanjut menggunakan Duncant’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT). Data dominasi komposisi botani ditabulasi menggunakan summed dominance ratio (SDR). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan intensitas cahaya, kecepatan angin, suhu lingkungan, dan komposisi botani gulma menurun seiring bertambahnya umur tanaman karet. Komposisi gulma perkebunan karet pada TBM 1-2 terdapat 32 spesies meliputi 5 rumput, 4 legum, 21 forb, dan 2 browse; TBM 3-4 terdapat 15 spesies meliputi 8 rumput, 2 legum, dan 5 forb, sedangkan TBM 5-6 terdapat 6 spesies meliputi 4 rumput, 1 legum, dan 1 forb. Gulma yang mendominasi masing-masing TBM yaitu Calopogonium mucunoides, Cyrtococcum acrescens dan Cyrtococcum oxyphyllum. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian disimpulkan gulma perkebunan karet lahan TBM 1–2 memiliki komposisi botani dan potensi tertinggi sebagai pakan ternak ruminansia. 

Kata kunci: Gulma; Kondisi lingkungan; Perkebunan Karet; TBM

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chong DT, Tajuddin I, Samat Abd MS, Stur WW and Shelton HM. 1997. “Stocking rate effects on sheep and forage productivity under rubber in Malaysia,” Journal of Agricultural Science. Cambridge. 128:339-346. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859696004236.
Daru TP, Yulianti A, dan Widodo E. 2014. “Potensi hijauan di perkebunan kelapa sawit sebagai pakan sapi potong di Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara,” Pastura. 3: 94-98.
Gabungan Perusahaan Karet Indonesia (GAPKINDO). 2016. “Tersedia di http://www.gapkindo.org/en/component/content/article/1-artikel/148-luas-perkebunan-karet-eng.html”. Di akses pada 18 Mei 2020.
Gomez KA and Gomez AA. 1984. “Statictic Procedure for Agricultural Research. Second Edition. An International Rice Research Institute Book. Coryright John and Sons Inc. New York. Toronto.
Ibrahim. 2003. “Strategi Penelitian Hijauan Mendukung Pengembangan Ternak Kambing Potong di Indonesia”, WARTAZOA. 13(1) : 1-8.
Joshua A and P Joseph. 2015. “A new weed management approach yo improve soil health in a tropical plantation crop, rubber (Hevea brasiliensis)”, Cambridge University Press. 52(1): 36-50.
Moody K, Munroe CE, Lubigan RT and Paller EC. 1984. “Major weeds of the Philippines”, Weed Science Society of the Philippines. University of the Philippines at Los Banos College, Laguna, Philippines.
Naidu VSGR. 2012. “Weed Identification”, Directorate of Weed Science Research. Jabalpur. India.
Nuhuyanan LE. 2010. “Pengaruh Pemupukan dan Introduksi Legum terhadap Kualitas Padang Rumput Alam di Kebar Kabupaten Manokwari”. Jurnal Ilmu Peternakan, 5(1): 13-19.
Santosa WH. 2017. “Profil PT. Perkebunan Nusantara IX Kebun Getas-Salatiga”. PTPN IX Getas – Salatiga, Jawa Tengah.
Simangunsong YP, Zaman S dan Guntoro D. 2018. “Manajemen Pengendalian Gulma Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.): Analisis Faktor- faktor Penentu Dominansi Gulma di Kebun Dolok Ilir, Sumatera Utara”, Buletin Agrohortikultura. 6(2):189–196. doi: 10.29244/agrob.6.2.189-196.
Soejono AT, Tohari, Pudjorinto dan Kastono AR. 2000. “Inventarisasi Gulma di Kebun PT. Pagilaran Kabupaten Batang”, PT. Pagilaran-Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta.
Subrata BAG dan Setiawan BA. 2018. “Keragaman vegetasi gulma di bawah tegakan pohon karet (Hevea Brasiliensis) pada umur dan arah lereng yang berbeda di PTPN IX Banyumas”, Jurnal Ilmiah Pertanian. 14(2): 1-13. doi: 10.31849/jip.v14i2.710.
Suhartono dan Winara A. 2018. “Keragaman dan Potensi Pemanfaatan Jenis Gulma pada Agroforestri Jati (Tectona grandis L.f) dan Jalawure (Tacca leontopetaloides (L) Kuntz)”, Jurnal Penelitian Hutan dan Konservasi Alam. 15(2): 65-77.
Syahputra E, Sarbino dan Dian S. 2011. “Weeds Assessment di Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit Lahan Gambut”, Jurnal Perkebunan dan Lahan Tropika. 1: 37-42.
Tauseef M, Ihsan F, Nazir W and Farooq J. 2012. “Weed flora and importance value index (IVI) of the weeds in cotton crop fields in the region of Khanewal, Pakistan”, Pakistan Journal Weed Science. Research. 18(3): 319-330.
Wahab HA. 2001. “Forages in oil palm and rubber plantation in Malaysia”. In: Moog, F. A.; Reynolds, S. G.; Maaruf, K. (Eds.), Proc. 7th Meet. Reg. Work. Group on Grazing and Feed Resources, Forage Dev. in South-East Asia: Strategies and Impacts, FAO, Indonesia.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-30