Editorial Process and Peer Review

JIPVET | EDITORIAL POLICIES

The Jurnal Ilmu Peternakan dan Veteriner Tropis (JIPVET) is committed to a fair, independent, and transparent editorial process. Manuscripts are assessed for their relevance to the journal's scope, scholarly quality, originality, and adherence to publication ethics.

The following policies set out the principles governing manuscript evaluation, editorial decisions, reviewer conduct, and the handling of complaints and appeals. Authors, reviewers, and editors are encouraged to consult these policies.

POLICY 01

Peer Review Policy

Information on manuscript screening, peer-review arrangements, reviewer assessment, author revisions, and editorial decisions.

Read policy →

POLICY 02

Editorial Decision-Making and Independence

Principles concerning editorial responsibility, independent scientific judgment, decision-making authority, and the management of potential conflicts of interest.

Read policy →

POLICY 03

Reviewer Responsibilities and Confidentiality

Standards for objective assessment, reviewer competence, confidentiality, responsible handling of manuscripts, and disclosure of competing interests.

Read policy →

POLICY 04

Complaints and Appeals Policy

Procedures for raising concerns about editorial decisions, peer-review conduct, and journal processes, including the consideration of formal appeals.

Read policy →

For general manuscript preparation and submission requirements, please consult the Author Guidelines and Submission Information .